<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The E-Discovery Sanctions Cube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/</link>
	<description>Blog by Ralph Losey on the team approach to electronic discovery combining the talents of Law, IT, and Science.  The views expressed are my own, and not necessarily those of my law firm, clients or University. Copyright Ralph Losey 2006-2012.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raising the Bar &#8211; Judge Scheindlin Defines Gross Negligence in Spoliation &#171; e-Discovery Team</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/#comment-9803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raising the Bar &#8211; Judge Scheindlin Defines Gross Negligence in Spoliation &#171; e-Discovery Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=7538#comment-9803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] situation the court was called upon to decide whether to award sanctions, and if so, how severe. In a prior blog William Hamilton proposed a three dimensional analytical framework called a sanction cube, with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] situation the court was called upon to decide whether to award sanctions, and if so, how severe. In a prior blog William Hamilton proposed a three dimensional analytical framework called a sanction cube, with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Losey</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/#comment-9653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Losey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=7538#comment-9653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Hamilton has solved the &quot;Rubik&#039;s Cube&quot; that is e-discovery sanctions law with a new cube of his own, a &quot;Hamilton&#039;s Cube!&quot; 

Bill came up with this idea for a three-dimensional analysis of sanctions cases while teaching our e-discovery class at the UF Law School this Fall.  I thought it was brilliant when I first heard him explain it in class (we often teach the class together). I saw for myself how well it worked to help students understand the plethora of sanctions case law. I really thought it deserved a full write-up and a 3d model to illustrate &quot;Hamilton&#039;s Cube.&quot; It did not take too much prodding on my part to get Bill to do it, and this excellent guest blog is the result. 

Many thanks to Professor Hamilton for contributing to the jurisprudence of e-discovery. I am honored to have his many contributions appear here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Hamilton has solved the &#8220;Rubik&#8217;s Cube&#8221; that is e-discovery sanctions law with a new cube of his own, a &#8220;Hamilton&#8217;s Cube!&#8221; </p>
<p>Bill came up with this idea for a three-dimensional analysis of sanctions cases while teaching our e-discovery class at the UF Law School this Fall.  I thought it was brilliant when I first heard him explain it in class (we often teach the class together). I saw for myself how well it worked to help students understand the plethora of sanctions case law. I really thought it deserved a full write-up and a 3d model to illustrate &#8220;Hamilton&#8217;s Cube.&#8221; It did not take too much prodding on my part to get Bill to do it, and this excellent guest blog is the result. </p>
<p>Many thanks to Professor Hamilton for contributing to the jurisprudence of e-discovery. I am honored to have his many contributions appear here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The E-​​Discovery Sanc­tions Cube &#124; Legal Technology Today</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/#comment-9648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The E-​​Discovery Sanc­tions Cube &#124; Legal Technology Today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=7538#comment-9648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [con­tin­ued] The E-​​Discovery Sanc­tions Cube « e-​​Discovery Team. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [con­tin­ued] The E-​​Discovery Sanc­tions Cube « e-​​Discovery Team. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charfles Skamser</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2009/11/29/the-e-discovery-sanctions-cube/#comment-9647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charfles Skamser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=7538#comment-9647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article. And, there is no doubt that the Rule 16 pretrial conference is the most important event in the entire eDiscovery/litigation process.  And, IMHO, its where more extensive use of Early Case Asessment technology and standard processes need to be adopted along with vigerous CLEs and possibly even ceritifcations for all parties involved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. And, there is no doubt that the Rule 16 pretrial conference is the most important event in the entire eDiscovery/litigation process.  And, IMHO, its where more extensive use of Early Case Asessment technology and standard processes need to be adopted along with vigerous CLEs and possibly even ceritifcations for all parties involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

