Comments on: Secrets of Search – Part II http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/ Blog by Ralph Losey on the team approach to electronic discovery combining the talents of Law, IT, and Science. The views expressed are Ralph's own, and not necessarily those of his law firm, clients or University. © Ralph Losey 2006-2013. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:22:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: There Can Be No Justice Without Truth, And No Truth Without Search | e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/#comment-49282 Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:45:22 +0000 http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=15032#comment-49282 [...] Secrets of Search – Part II. [...]

]]> By: The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall | e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/#comment-48143 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:36:56 +0000 http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=15032#comment-48143 [...] all relevant ESI? I examined this question at length in my Secrets of Search series, volumes one, two and three. Still, people find it hard to accept, especially in view of the unregulated clamor of the [...]

]]> By: Analysis of the Official Report on the 2011 TREC Legal Track – Part Two « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/#comment-38499 Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:10:01 +0000 http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=15032#comment-38499 [...] The reviews were done by four e-discovery vendors with professional review teams who generously donated their services: ACT Litigation Services, Inc., Business Intelligence Associates, Inc. (“BIA”), Daegis, and IE Discovery, Inc. It is not known whether the individual reviewers were paid, but the authors of the study stated that they presumed they were. (I hope they were too, and at their full rates, but perhaps these companies would leave a comment below to confirm these assumptions? This has to do with the observation that I made in a prior article that money is a motivator. Secrets of Search – Part II) [...]

]]> By: An Elusive Dialogue on Legal Search: Part Two – Hunger Games and Hybrid Multimodal Quality Controls « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/#comment-38040 Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:21:36 +0000 http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=15032#comment-38040 [...] just a few questions that occur to me off the top of my head. There are surely more. Last year in Part Two of Secrets of Search I suggested nine characteristics of what I hope would become an accepted best practice for legal [...]

]]> By: Day Ten of a Predictive Coding Narrative: A post hoc test of my hypothesis of insignificant false negatives « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/18/secrets-of-search-part-ii/#comment-37536 Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:26:39 +0000 http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/?p=15032#comment-37536 [...] five rules of search safety. They were explained in my Secrets of Search trilogy in parts One, Two, and Three and are shown below in another version of the Olympic [...]

]]>