<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secrets of Search &#8211; Part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Blog by Ralph Losey on the team approach to electronic discovery combining the talents of Law, IT, and Science.  The views expressed are Ralph&#039;s own, and not necessarily those of his law firm, clients or University. © Ralph Losey 2006-2013.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparative Efficacy of Two Predictive Coding Reviews of 699,082 Enron Documents &#124; e-Discovery Team ®</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/#comment-54903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comparative Efficacy of Two Predictive Coding Reviews of 699,082 Enron Documents &#124; e-Discovery Team ®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=15447#comment-54903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of legal search should always be on retrieval of Hot documents, not relevant documents. Losey, R. Secrets of Search – Part III (2011) (the 4th secret). This is based in part on the well-known rule of 7 +/- 2 that is often [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of legal search should always be on retrieval of Hot documents, not relevant documents. Losey, R. Secrets of Search – Part III (2011) (the 4th secret). This is based in part on the well-known rule of 7 +/- 2 that is often [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There Can Be No Justice Without Truth, And No Truth Without Search &#124; e-Discovery Team ®</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/#comment-49283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[There Can Be No Justice Without Truth, And No Truth Without Search &#124; e-Discovery Team ®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=15447#comment-49283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Secrets of Search – Part III. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Secrets of Search – Part III. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall &#124; e-Discovery Team ®</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/#comment-48144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall &#124; e-Discovery Team ®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=15447#comment-48144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ESI? I examined this question at length in my Secrets of Search series, volumes one, two and three. Still, people find it hard to accept, especially in view of the unregulated clamor of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ESI? I examined this question at length in my Secrets of Search series, volumes one, two and three. Still, people find it hard to accept, especially in view of the unregulated clamor of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journey into the Borg Hive (Full Story Restatement) &#171; e-Discovery Team ®</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/#comment-46542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Journey into the Borg Hive (Full Story Restatement) &#171; e-Discovery Team ®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=15447#comment-46542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of trial practice would never change as long as the jury trial remained a fundamental right: 7 +/-2. The number of electronic communications was ever-increasing, but not discussions of topics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of trial practice would never change as long as the jury trial remained a fundamental right: 7 +/-2. The number of electronic communications was ever-increasing, but not discussions of topics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Elusive Dialogue on Legal Search: Part Two &#8211; Hunger Games and Hybrid Multimodal Quality Controls &#171; e-Discovery Team ®</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryteam.com/2011/12/29/secrets-of-search-part-iii/#comment-38041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Elusive Dialogue on Legal Search: Part Two &#8211; Hunger Games and Hybrid Multimodal Quality Controls &#171; e-Discovery Team ®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=15447#comment-38041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] no understanding of actual trials, cumulative evidence, and the modern data koan of big data &#8220;relevant is irrelevant.&#8221; Even though random sampling is not The Answer we once thought, it should be part of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no understanding of actual trials, cumulative evidence, and the modern data koan of big data &#8220;relevant is irrelevant.&#8221; Even though random sampling is not The Answer we once thought, it should be part of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
