Comments on: The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/ Blog by Ralph Losey on the team approach to electronic discovery combining the talents of Law, IT, and Science. The views expressed are Ralph's own, and not necessarily those of his law firm, clients or University. © Ralph Losey 2006-2013. Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:07:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: There Can Be No Justice Without Truth, And No Truth Without Search | e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/#comment-49279 Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:45:13 +0000 http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=16322#comment-49279 [...] The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall. [...]

]]> By: Analysis of the Official Report on the 2011 TREC Legal Track – Part Two « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/#comment-38501 Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:10:08 +0000 http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=16322#comment-38501 [...] Again, for a deeper understanding, I suggest you study the Overview of the TREC 2011 Legal Track report and its many charts. The charts especially bear close scrutiny. The report may not give you the clear answer to your questions about who won TREC, or how good any particular search software or strategy may be. But, with respect dear readers, these are not the right questions to ask. Beware of all marketing claims about search, and especially ones with easy buttons and claims of near perfect recall. It is a myth. See The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall. [...]

]]> By: Going “All Out” for Predictive Coding and Vendor Cost Savings « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/#comment-36435 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:06:39 +0000 http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=16322#comment-36435 [...] The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall; [...]

]]> By: Good, Better, Best: a Tale of Three Proportionality Cases – Part One « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/#comment-33010 Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:27:57 +0000 http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=16322#comment-33010 [...] The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall; [...]

]]> By: New Methods for Legal Search and Review « e-Discovery Team ® http://e-discoveryteam.com/2012/01/29/the-legal-implications-of-what-science-says-about-recall/#comment-32212 Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:15:01 +0000 http://e-discoveryteam.com/?p=16322#comment-32212 [...] Software has advanced to the point that computer review alone is at least as accurate as manual review, the so-called gold standard, and is getting better all of the time. Maura R. Grossman & Gordon v. Cormack, Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review, Rich. J.L. & Tech., Spring 2011, at 48; Herbert L. Roitblat, Anne Kershaw, Patrick Oot, Document Categorization in Legal Electronic Discovery: Computer Classification vs. Manual Review (Electronic Discovery Institute 2009); Also see my prior blogs: Secrets of Search: Parts One, Two, and Three; and, The Legal Implications of What Science Says About Recall. [...]

]]>