News Flash – First Suit Filed Against ChatGPT For Hallucinatory Libel

June 8, 2023

Ralph Losey. Published June 8, 2023.

A liable suit was filed on June 5, 2023 in Georgia against OpenAI for Libelous Writings by ChatGPT. This appears to be the first law suit against an AI, at least the first against ChatGPT for Libel. See below for the full complaint.

In view of the spoofing and reliability issues prevalent now, I felt compelled to personally verify with plaintiff’s counsel, John R. Monroe, that this was a real case. He did so verify and also provided me with a true copy and correct of the actual complaint he filed in Georgia State Court. This was by email a few minutes ago. He said nothing to me about the case (as is entirely proper, although I did ask for a comment.) Mr. Monroe just sent me the complaint. I also personally verified that John R. Monroe, is a member in good standing of the Georgia Bar. The libel complaint is a quick read and I suggest you check it out. See below and attached. I will try to follow this case as it progresses.

Basically the allegations are that ChatGPT (version not identified) libeled the plaintiff by hallucinating and telling a journalist about a law suit that did not, and does not exist. In this made-up law suit, the libeled plaintiff here, Mark Walters, had supposedly been sued for “breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and other claims arising from Walters’ misappropriation of SAF’s funds and assets for his own benefit, and his manipulation of SAF’s financial records and bank statements to conceal his activities.” See Exhibit “A” to the libel complaint below and attached.

This hallucination was prompted by a third-party journalist and OpenAI subscriber, Fred Riehl, who used ChatGPT to summarize a real case concerning Second Amendment issues. The journalist asked ChatGPT to provide a summary of the allegations and provided a link to ChatGPT of the complaint (thus I presume this was a newer version of ChatGPT that can read links, but perhaps not, which would explain a lot). The link and complaint appears to be a real case in federal court concerning Second Amendment rights, which seeks a declaration and injunctive relief: https://www.saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Dkt-1-Complaint.pdf.

The summary response by ChatGPT of this real case is where the AI hallucination and libel begins. Walters alleges that ChatGPT told the journalist, Riehl, who was supposedly investigating the Second Amendment case, that the case was against Walters, which it was not (Walters was not a party to the case, although he is apparently well-known concerning Second Amendment issues). ChatGPT also told Riehl that the case accused Walters of defrauding and embezzling funds. There are no such allegations. The case has nothing to do with Walters. The journalist then asked ChatGPT “to provide him with a copy of the portion of the complaint related to Walters.” Chat GPT replied and provided the same made up allegations against Walters that were supposedly in the complaint. Now Riehl responded by asking ChatGPT to provide him the entire text of the complaint. That is when ChatGPT responded by generating the fictitious complaint, Exhibit “A” to Walter’s complaint. It also purports to be in district court and even has a made-up case number, but no signature line.

I am going to refrain from analysis and adopt a non-interference position here; just report the facts and get this news out fast. Here is the link to the libel complaint and its exhibit.

Ralph Losey Copyright 2023 – All Rights Reserved


The Poetry of e-Discovery – PRODUCTIONS

April 28, 2023

Ralph Losey. Published April 28, 2023.

Rule 34 FRCP, Written as New Poetry, with Chat GPT.

All Inspiration, Prompts and Sane QC by Me, Human Ralph Losey.

I end this poetry series with a different twist. The translation of Rule 34 is again by ChatGPT4, but this time the animation reading is by me, Ralph Losey. Well, my voice anyway. Also, I put the reading up front, rather than at the end. The video is not of me, or an avatar I created, but instead uses a well-known drawing of Shakespeare. The drawing is animated and lip-synced to my reading by a new program I’m trying out, HeyGen.

It is still amazing to me how ChatGPT4’s poetic renderings open up new insights and perspective in these very complex and otherwise dry and somewhat boring Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any law professors or other instructors are welcome to use these poems with their students.

If you have not noticed, the two intro paras above to this series have been Haikus. Here is one more Haiku with advice to all dear readers before they listen to the reading.

Listen to the heart

Of the rule’s deep poetry;

Sit back and relax.

Rule 34 Poetry Reading

In the realm of federal procedure, where justice oft’ weaves,

Rule 34, a tale of documents and electronically stored leaves,

A party’s quest to gather knowledge from the depths of cyberspace,

To bring forth truth and understanding in a legal embrace.

With scope laid out by Rule 26(b), the path to knowledge clear,

Request to produce, permit inspection, test, or sample, my dear,

From designated documents and data, to tangible things,

To entering lands and properties, where secrets may take wings.

Through writings, drawings, graphs, and charts, the stored information flows,

In photographs and sound recordings, a digital garden grows,

Translated by the diligent hand, to a form that all may see,

This rule, the guide, the cornerstone, of discovery’s decree.

The request must bear the hallmarks of a reasonable pursuit,

Particularity, time and place, in the inspection’s route,

A form or forms may be specified for electronic yield,

So harmony in production and requests may be revealed.

A time to respond, the clock begins, with thirty days to spare,

From service or, with Rule 26(d)(2), from the conference fair,

A shorter or a longer time, by stipulation or court’s decree,

The response, a dance of words, objections and discovery.

Each item met with an embrace, or an objection swift and true,

Grounds for such, with reasons laid, the path of knowledge to construe,

Copies offered in lieu of inspection, a gesture of goodwill,

But within the time specified or reasonable, the quest fulfill.

Objections, oh, objections! The shield against unwarranted pry,

Responsive materials withheld, the basis must not belie,

Partial objection, clear and specific, permit inspection of the rest,

In the dance of words and reason, the truth shall be undressed.

The form, the form, the electronic form, in which the data’s shown,

Objecting to the requested, or when no form was known,

The party states the form they choose, the data to bequeath,

For producing the documents or electronically stored wreath.

As kept in course of business, or with categories matched,

The documents produced, the knowledge sought, the stories to be hatched,

Ordinarily maintained, or reasonably usable forms ensue,

Not once, but twice, the same information need not accrue.

Nonparties, too, may feel the touch of Rule 45’s embrace,

Compelled to produce or permit, the truth they must not chase,

The inspection, documents, and tangible things, their role to play,

In the quest for justice, truth, and light, that ever leads the way.

Upon the stage of litigation, where actors gather ’round,

The dance of words and reason, in harmony, profound,

The rhythm of the rules, the beat of the procedure’s heart,

The melody of justice, where every note plays a part.

The clock ticks on, the days pass by, the deadline drawing near,

The response to come, with words of wisdom, objections to appear,

And as the dance continues, a ballet of legal grace,

Each step a move toward understanding, the truth to embrace.

Through the twists and turns of reason, the maze of legal thought,

A path emerges, clear and bright, the sought-for knowledge caught,

The documents, the data, the tangible and more,

Revealed, unfurled, presented, by the guiding hand of Rule 34.

And as the dance concludes, the final notes of justice played,

The truth unveiled, the knowledge gained, the foundation firmly laid,

A story told, a tale complete, through the labyrinth of the law,

By the guiding hand of Rule 34, where discovery was the draw.

Oh, Rule 34, your words of wisdom, your tapestry of fate,

A pillar of the justice system, your power to illuminate,

In the realm of federal procedure, where justice oft’ weaves,

A beacon of light, a guide, through the depths of cyberspace’s leaves.

Ralph Losey Copyright 2023 — All Rights Reserved


The Poetry of e-Discovery – RELEVANCE

April 27, 2023

Ralph Losey. Published April 27, 2023.

Rule 26 (b), Written as New Poetry, with Chat GPT.

All Inspiration, Prompts and Sane QC by Me, Human Ralph Losey.

In chambers of law, where discovery reigns,

A realm of relevance, the seeker gains,

Bound by order, the court’s command,

A world of knowledge, close at hand.

The scope of discovery, wide and far,

A tale of claims and defenses, a memoir,

Proportional to the needs of the case,

In balance with the issues, an intricate chase.

From the importance of issues, stakes arise,

To the amount contested, a sum that belies,

The parties’ resources and access to the truth,

A dance of discovery, both graceful and uncouth.

Yet, burden and expense play their part,

Their worth weighed against the knowledge they impart,

Discoverable matter, tangible and veiled,

The identities and locations, where knowledge is hailed.

Good cause may lead the court to order more,

To delve deeper into the subject matter’s core,

Though not admissible, the relevance may stay,

If the path of discovery leads to evidence that may sway.

But limitations are imposed, to keep it in check,

By order or local rule, a sturdy ship’s deck,

From interrogatories to depositions, the limits set,

The court governs the number, lest we forget.

Electronic data, a separate beast,

Accessibility and burden, on this we feast,

Yet, the court may order, with good cause shown,

To pierce the veil, a decision condoned.

As trial preparation beckons, the stage is set,

Materials and documents, a tableau we’ll not forget,

Protected, prepared, anticipating the fight,

Yet discoverable still, if the need shines a light.

Experts and their wisdom, a treasure to share,

Deposed and examined, their knowledge laid bare,

Draft reports and communications, a shield to protect,

Except when the facts and assumptions intersect.

Privilege and protection, these claims we respect,

Information withheld, a delicate subject,

Yet described with precision, without revealing the core,

A balance struck, in this legal folklore.

In this realm of discovery, the dance we perform,

Seeking truth and justice, the essence we transform,

A poetic journey through the legal maze,

In relevance and proportion, we shall spend our days.

Rule 26(b) Poetry reading by a favorite Ai judge

Ralph Losey Copyright 2023 — All Rights Reserved


The Poetry of e-Discovery – COOPERATION

April 26, 2023

Ralph Losey. Published April 26, 2023.

Foundation Rule 1, Written as New Poetry, with Chat GPT.

All Inspiration, Prompts and Sane QC by Me, Human Ralph Losey.

In the halls of justice, a tapestry unfolds,

A realm where Rule 1 stands, a tale of wisdom told,

A foundation, a guide, for rules of civil grace,

A prime directive, firm and true, in every single case.

“Scope and Purpose,” a clarion call, resounds throughout the land,

A compass for the court and parties, guiding every hand,

For every action, every proceeding, a constant, steady light,

Rule 1, the keeper of the flame, the guardian of the night.

Construed, administered, employed, a sacred trinity,

By court and parties, side by side, in perfect unity,

A just, a speedy, and inexpensive path to seek,

The determination of each case, where truth and reason speak.

In twenty-fifteen, a change was made, the message to refine,

To emphasize the role of parties, each word a sacred line,

A shared responsibility, a dance of law and fate,

Upon the stage of litigation, the truth to liberate.

The Committee Note, a guiding voice, a testament of time,

A call for cooperation, harmony, and rhyme,

To discourage over-use, misuse, and tools of delay,

A plea for proportional use, the just and righteous way.

For every lawyer, every party, a mission to achieve,

A balance of advocacy, in the justice they believe,

To employ the rules with honor, a cooperative embrace,

In the spirit of Rule 1, a journey to retrace.

No new source of sanctions, this amendment makes it clear,

Nor an abridgment of the rules, no cause for doubt or fear,

A simple call to unity, a partnership profound,

To secure the just, the speedy, and the inexpensive, all around.

Oh, Rule 1, your essence, your purpose, and your scope,

A guiding star, a beacon bright, a lantern of great hope,

Through you, the courts and parties march, as one, with purpose grand,

To secure the just, the speedy, and the inexpensive, hand in hand.

Rule 1 Poetry Reading by a Favorite Ai

Ralph Losey Copyright – All Rights Reserved