e-Discovery, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, and Human Judgment
In April 2026, OpenAI revealed an unexpected pattern in its Codex AI, which frequently mentioned fantastical creatures like goblins and gremlins. This incident highlighted how training incentives can influence AI behavior and cause problematic outputs. The implications for the legal field emphasize the necessity for rigorous verification and human oversight in AI usage.
Ralph Losey discusses the complexities of Generative AI, likening the current era to a “Gutenberg Moment” due to its opaque nature. He emphasizes the importance of understanding AI’s underlying processes to mitigate professional risks. The article outlines various ways to comprehend AI, from basic guessing to advanced technical insights, ultimately urging legal professionals to validate AI outputs.
Ralph Losey highlights the findings from Gemini 3.1 Pro, revealing the top ten questions people have about AI from 2024-2026. These inquiries primarily focus on understanding AI’s mechanics, the socio-economic impact, ethical concerns, and existential questions. The data underscores public anxiety about immediate AI implications over long-term concerns, emphasizing the need for transparent communication.
In 2025, we transitioned from AI adoption to AI entanglement, blending human training with advanced AI capabilities. This year marked a shift towards treating AI as agents requiring skepticism and verification. As legal standards evolve with quantum law, the importance of human oversight and resilience against misinformation has never been clearer.
Ralph Losey, December 22, 2025 Google AI Adds to My Last Article I used Google’s NotebookLM to analyze my last article, Cross-Examine Your AI: The Lawyer’s Cure for Hallucinations. I started with the debate feature, where two AIs have a Read More …