7 thoughts on “We Are at the Dawn of a Golden Age of Justice”

  1. Well said, Ralph.

    Our courts are struggling to keep up with the power of technology not only with eDiscovery but with the administration of justice as well. IMO the Florida state courts are doing a reasonably good job of trying to harness information without some of the adverse side effects. Case in point #1: Keeping court records “open” while maintaining the right amount of privacy for litigants. The Florida Supreme Court is carefully negotiating this minefield. See, e.g., http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2011/sc08-2443.pdf.
    Case in point #2: Jurors want to use internet research to seek the truth and judges and lawyers want decisions based solely on what they hear in court. Florida now has comprehensive standard instructions. See http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2010/sc10-51.pdf. Whether that is enough to keep jurors in bounds remains to be seen. Judge Scheindlin’s idea of having jurors sign a pledge is a remarkable outside the box methodology. See http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/nyregion/us-judge-considers-making-jurors-vow-not-to-use-web.html.

    With all this roiling of the waters as we drag courts into the information age, I join Ralph in remaining optimistic about the overwhelming value of technology in seeking the truth, which is always the touchstone of justice.

Leave a Reply